To Firm or Not to Firm? How to Choose Between Going Solo or Going Big



Photo by Frischmilch.

Before going out on their own, many freelancers struggle with the idea of how to position themselves in their market of expertise. Considering many freelancers have at one time worked in an agency setting, it’s tempting to have the agency mind-set when crafting your promotional materials.

For example, the decision of whether to use ‘I’ or ‘We’ can dramatically affect the way you’re perceived by prospective clients; “We can deliver excellent results” sounds much larger than “I can deliver excellent results”. The big question, then, is this: do you want to be an agency or a freelancer?

The truth is, most big agencies started as one or two people. For those who knew they didn’t want their business to stay small, they had to position themselves as something greater than what they were, and grow slowly over time. Therefore, any freelancer starting out has to consider the question of whether he/she wants to stay a freelancer, or grow into a firm. There are definite pros and cons to either approach. Here are just 5 factors to consider:

1. Overhead
2. Competition

3. Client caliber

4. Hourly rate

5. Busyness

Freelance

1. Little overhead. When you work from home, as most freelancers do, you have little to pay for, other than the cost of keeping a roof over your head, food in the fridge and the internet connection plugged in. Most of the money you make can go directly into your pocket, whether that be a savings account, investments, or a new Apple cinema display. The lower your overhead, the higher your profit margins.

2. Competitors are colleagues. Competition is fierce in any business, and the same goes with freelance design/programming/writing. That being said; many of our freelance competitors tend to be colleagues or even friends. People we can have a beer while sharing client horror stories. Sure, we may lose projects to them on occasion, but for the most part, there’s enough work to go around, and clients make their hiring decisions based on our portfolio, price, experience and professionalism — and nothing else.

3. Worth less in the client’s eyes. While reputable freelancers can certainly gather big client work, many large companies tend to favor established firms for their $50K projects. It can be hard to convince a prospective client that you can do the same quality of work as a 10 person company with a downtown office, a team of designers and coders, and an attractive front-desk person who offers to hang up the clients’ jacket and make them a cup of coffee. Meanwhile, the lowly freelancer is sitting with the prospect in a Starbucks. The truth is, many prospects worry a one-man band is unreliable since, as they often put it, we could ‘get hit by a bus tomorrow.’

4. Lower rate = no outsource potential. Let’s face it, freelancers generally can’t command the high rates that even small agencies do. Clients know we don’t have to pay employee salaries, or keep the phone system running, so the same caliber of work will often get sold at half the rate that the big boys charge. Because of this, freelancers generally can’t afford to outsource their work and turn a profit. As a result, they can only bill for the hours that they are physically able to work. This may mean they have to turn down work on occasion.

5. Octopus syndrome. Freelancers tend to suffer from this. They are required to be all things to all people; designer, writer, programmer, copywriter, strategist, accountant, cold-caller, dog walker, networking-event shmoozer — the list goes on. As previously stated, freelancers usually can’t afford to outsource their responsibilities, which means they have less time to be working on the stuff that actually pays the bills.

Firm/agency

1. Major overhead. Office rent, furniture, computer hardware and software (times the number of employees), file servers, phone systems, not to mention salaries — firms and agencies have overhead to spare. It’s usually the ol’ bricks and mortar that destroys the cool little design firm that used to churn-out award winning work… before they went under.

2. Competitors: they’re out to get you. Unlike freelancers, competing agencies are usually not the best of friends. Because of the aforementioned overhead problem, every agency needs all the work they can get. That means they’re usually savagely competing with other firms on proposals, and often bad-talking their competitors when they can. That can be a little unnerving when your monthly break-even rate is 50K.

3. More credible to large clients. One of the benefits of being considered an agency is that big clients with big projects have no problem handing you big wads of cash. You’ve got an office and a fancy phone system, so the client has less concern about liability. In this case, perception is everything.

4. Higher rates mean outsourcing potential. Because agency rates tend to be in the triple-digit-per-hour range, you as a business owner can leverage the talents of other people, whether that be salaried employees or contracted freelancers. This means you can take on more projects, and, if well managed, can turn a good profit.

Think about this in simple terms; imagine you could take on 10 projects a month, at $10,000 per project, each one requiring 50 hours of development time. You have 10 good contractors to outsource to who charge $50/hour, one contractor on each project. If you paid each contractor $2,500 for a job, and took the time to manage each client and each contractor, directing the quality of the work and the expectations of the client — you’ve just made $75,000 that month, you’ve got 10 happy clients, and 10 happy contractors who can be used in future projects. This is something you would have never been able to achieve as a solo freelancer.

5. More time to focus. In theory, if you have a team of either employees or freelancers at your disposal, you should have more time to do what you do best. If you find you’re better at developing business than designing, then you can hire a great designer and have fun watching her work some magic while you profit off of it. If you love being creative, but have trouble managing the business end (paying bills, invoicing, networking etc.), then you can hire someone else to fill that role. That means you’re spending your time doing what you love and what you’re good at, and avoiding the octopus syndrome freelancers often contend with.

Do what feels right

So what do you choose? There is no right or wrong answer because it all depends on what you value most. If you’re positioning yourself as a business, you can hope for more money in the long term, but more initial stress and start-up risks to go with it, and greater complexity overall.

Freelancing tends to offer a simpler way of life: working on what you want, when you want, but it may not bring the prestige of working on million dollar projects for international brands, or making the top CEO list in the local business mag.

Every company starts as one or two people, but it is your positioning that will dictate your growth potential. If you’re content to stay as an independent freelancer without any ball-and-chain overhead, then position yourself honestly as such.

Do you have any other factors that can help you decide whether or not to grow your freelance business bigger?

For over five years, Kyle worked at various Halifax-based publishing, advertising and interactive firms in senior design roles. His entrepreneurial spirit, and passion for his craft led him to form Headspace in early 2007, and he has since gained a loyal base of clients, both local and international.

PG

For over five years, Kyle worked at various Halifax-based publishing, advertising and interactive firms in senior design roles. His entrepreneurial spirit, and passion for his craft led him to form Headspace in early 2007, and he has since gained a loyal base of clients, both local and international.



  1. PG Grant

    Great article, I feel you are entirely right in what you say, you need to do what feels comfortable. Do you want to put in more work and one day be “The Man” and have people working for you or are you happy being a freelancer, picking your own hours, holidays, clients etc…

    There is no one answer, but this article does cover the best of the pros and cons of both.

    If you are unsure on what you should do, say where do you see yourself and your freelance business in 5 years? Do you want to expand?

  2. PG Karen Zara

    I’ve seen some people criticising and even ridiculing freelancers who choose to position themselves as businesses. However, I’ve always felt that there’s nothing wrong with that choice, as long as you are sure you can bear its consequences.

    To me, the outsourcing potential is the main advantage of having a firm. This is something many freelancers fail to realise; they seem to be “afraid” of outsourcing. Perhaps they think they’ll look less competent and/or make less money with they hire other people to work for them.

  3. PG Queen Vee

    There’s also a ‘third way’. A designer friend of mine has just signed the lease on an office space where she and a bunch of other freelancers will be working together. She and one of the others will be operating a small craft business on top of their regular freelance work, too. It seems like a good solution: it gives you a physical office and shop, support, and colleagues to farm out work to. Whether or not you take a cut from that work is something you’d have to agree on, of course.

    At the moment I’m happy to fly solo with the help of a network of people I pass work onto and get work from. I’m even launching a online retail business by myself. I think the advantage of freelancing in my field (publishing) is, first, flexibility, and second, that your own personality is part of the package you offer. Down the track I may well follow my friend’s lead, though.

  4. PG Jonathan Ober

    I agree with the second poster, especially on the grounds of outsourcing work. I recently have taken on a few projects that had huge deadlines that I wasn’t going to meet. I reached into my pool of friends and found on who’s work and rates was great for me and they got the job done on time. I made the jump into hiring someone else to code for me since i’d rather design, anyday…

  5. PG Kevin Crawford

    I’m in the process of trying out a sort of intermediate step. I’m a designer / front-end web developer, and I’ve partnered up with a programmer to start a business. We’ll be working in a “virtual office,” and will out source work to others on a project basis. We’ll see how it goes.

    @Jonathon Ober: So you love to design, eh? Well I love to code designs. Maybe we should talk :)

  6. PG Internet Mogal

    Interesting discussion. I have a question. Is there happy medium where you’re not just a freelancer but don’t want to be the big agency either? I love the idea that Queen Vee mentions where you’re sharing office space with other freelancers to create a collective “agency” of sorts. It’s not quite a partnership but more communial-based. That’s great.

    I am in New York and I don’t quite see that collective mindset here. I guess because there’s so much competition here. I freelance but don’t want to be seen as just a freelancer. Yet I don’t want to be a big agency. I hate working from home but can’t afford to spend on an office quite yet.

    Am I stuck in a grey area where I need to decide “freelance” or “agency” or is there a happy medium? Does anyone have suggestions?

  7. PG Jakub Pawlowicz

    @Queen Vee – you read my mind. :-) That was my first thought when I went through the story, and I think it’s a very powerful combination of some Freelancing and kind of agency/firm.

  8. PG Mokokoma

    Well written. I doubt wealth can be achieved from freelancing… good money yes, but not wealth.

  9. PG Jenn McGroary

    Wow, I agree with the recent comments of Queen Vee and Internet Mogel. I am at the point where I’d love to be able to grow my business more, but I only have so many hours of time available. I’ve been toying with the idea of adding “freelance partners” to kind of appear that I am bigger than a one person company, but not too big. And to help in the areas that I’d don’t know how to do efficiently. Such as larger programing projects. I am good with the front end design and the marketing aspect of things, but when it comes to any custom programing, I need to outsource that stuff.

    I know a couple of people who have a two/three person set up like that were one handles the design, one the programing, and the other the copy writing. I’d like to get to that point within the next 6 months.

  10. PG Jonathan Snook

    I’ve been struggling with this decision for over a year now. I’ve tried to bring on somebody once before but as always, I realize I’m just not a great manager. It’s hard to manage my own work as well as dedicate the time to make sure that somebody else knows what they should be working on, that I’m available for questions if need be, that I’m available to review and test things. I’ve been doing the solo freelance thing again for quite some time and once again the thought to expand is back in my head… but I don’t want to be an agency. I like being small and choosing the projects that I want to work on. But it’s a constant project-to-project with little scheduling flexibility because I don’t often have the ability to offset any of the work.

    As you can see, I haven’t made up my mind yet. :) (and unfortunately, while informative, the article still hasn’t pushed me one way or another…)

    For those in NYC (or other major cities), check out Jelly. It’s a casual co-working thing. They have a wiki set up at http://wiki.workatjelly.com/.

  11. PG Kyle Racki

    Thanks for all your comments so far. Glad to see this is generating some real discussion, making me realize how much this issue is in the back of most freelancers’ minds.

    @Jonathan Snook – I never wrote this post with the intention of pushing anyone either way, merely spelling out the pros and cons of each approach (and thankfully, others are adding new approaches to the discussion.) I would feel bad if this article pushed you in one direction, and that direction didn’t work out for you :)

    I see more and more design collectives around, groups/networks of freelancers under one roof, so to speak. In fact, I’m even a part of one here in Nova Scotia http://www.qsstudios.ca/
    I love the concept, it’s just a matter of getting clients on board with the idea of multiple freelancers in a “virtual agency”. Not always an easy sell.

  12. PG Brian

    I think it’s good to start off working at an agency – a small agency where you can make a difference and have valid imput on projects. I work at a small agency and do freelance work on the side and it’s a nice supplemental income. For one, you really limit how much money you can truly make by being solo. You can really only make what you invest in it and even then you’re capped by the hours in the day. The only way you can make the big bucks is creating a viable business model with people and office.

  13. PG Calvin Cox

    Great Post! Very informative; I was looking for a site that I could tell my readers about and JACKPOT. Awesome content. Thanks.

  14. PG Russ

    Great article, some of the points you brought up are why I am trying to build a hybrid type firm. My goal is to be a small shop with around 5-7 employees and we will run out of my home – actually we will run out of the guest house in my backyard. I think it will work out pretty well, but we will see….

  15. PG James Lytle

    This has been the main struggle in my mind for my business over the last year. I’m a designer. Flat out.. I can manage, but only because I have to. It seems like there are countless freelancers in the same boat as me and we all want to be able to handle a bit larger projects, and present ourselves as such to larger companies but we need the organization to do it properly. Any great manager out there want to create a call to ‘design’ arms… and make this freelance community float with the big fish? … may not really be the right answer…but its a thought.

  16. PG Hollis Bartlett

    I think part of the decision to be solo or agency has to come from your location, targeted clientelle and business model. This is my second time around being self -employed, first time I was a ‘company’ which worked well. This time, as I am in a different geographic location, I opted for solo, doing business under my name. In a smaller place, when much of your clientelle is local you name counts. So far it’s working out.

    Having said that, I understand you’re limited by being solo somewhat, but I think there is another option other than partnering up; outsourcing. Many designers operate as ’solo’, using their name as their brand, but eventually reach a point where they are just the face of the company, the personality, but not the worker. Their name becomes the brand, the character of the company. Think Ralph Loren, Chip Foose, etc for examples in the stratosphere. It makes for a good business plan, a ‘next level’ of freelancing.

    If you don’t have or want the staff, outsourcing works as well, there are tons of companies that will ‘white box’ your products for you. I think the trick is to maintain tight quality control so as not to tarnish your name and brand.

  17. PG Joe Norton

    Interesting article. I agree that the happy medium would be something like a coworking space like Indy hall in Philadelphia = http://www.indyhall.org

    I’m also a strong believer in freelance teams. It’s difficult for a client to hand over a massive project – but they might not have so many hesitations when you’ve got a freelance team of sorts. This team not being an actual company, just a set of freelancers that – when the need arises – work together to make something that would’ve been impossible/taken too long otherwise.

  18. PG MRK

    Great post. Also agree with Queen Vee, Internet Mogal and Jonathan Snook.

    I’m in the same boat, and have also been struggling with this decision. Currently freelancing, but really want to get into a position where I can outsource work so that I can take on more projects and have some more flexibility, rather than only being able to dedicate myself to only a single [large] project at a time.

    One of the problems with moving from a freelancer to becoming an agency is that your rates need to increase a lot and you risk losing some (or all) of your clients in the process, which could mean starting from scratch with finding clients and building up your business again.

    A friend of mine in another major city started something like Queen Vee mentioned, which is shared office space targeted towards freelancers and micro-businesses working in the digital space, and it’s been a big success. Just wish there was something like that here in Orlando, FL…

    One of the other problems with going from being a freelancer to an agency is that it usually means going from what you love (in my case, writing code) to doing more business-ey type stuff like meeting clients, writing proposals, etc, which can change one’s perspective a bit.

    This post does a good job of laying out the pros and cons, but like Jonathan, I’m still undecided, but don’t see myself freelancing in 5 years time, so at some point I’ll have to become an agency or cave-in and return to cubicle land.

  19. PG Gary

    You forgot the biggest pro of going big time: fortune and glory.

  20. PG Neil

    “fortune and glory” amen to that

  21. PG Rongen

    Very good article! Thanks for the enlightenment.

    @Mococoma. Wealth can be achieved by some, but the most rewarding thing in freelancing is health.

  22. PG Rene

    thanks. i was waiting for that kind of post, i asked for it into an other post comment ;-) i’ts great to discuss both sides of possibilities !!

Leave a Comment