Advertise Here

Review: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2



The world of photography is changing, and while freelancers have always had an opportunity to participate in this lucrative realm, it is becoming more and more accessible to the masses as the price for equipment and software falls. The difference between a good and great photography business isn’t simply based on the camera you choose. More important is the way you cut through the waves of images, carefully selecting, editing, and printing the best of breed.

If you want to be competitive, you need to learn to hone your workflow. There are many ways to accomplish the task, and in this review we are taking a closer look at Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2. Is it mature enough to provide the necessary tools for the trade? Can it give one an edge in their own market? Read on to find out.

Work Your Workflow

As mentioned before, solid workflow is vital to success with RAW (or even JPEG, TIFF, or photos in PSD, for that matter). While each user will find their own method of taking advantages of the capabilities within Lightroom, establishing a set of guidelines, rules, and methods is what this dynamic application is tuned for. While remarkably similar results can be obtained using Camera RAW (a Photoshop plug-in), the procedure to unify the development of images will often be more complicated than using Lightroom. And who says you shouldn’t enjoy the processing as much as the picture taking?

Five modules make up the whole of Lightroom and, for the most part, it’s workflow capabilities: Library, Develop, Slideshow, Print, and Web. While each module is designed for a specific task, the interface is standardized, allowing the user to focus on their task, rather than switching between multiple applications. Switching between these is as simple as pressing a key, and the transition is remarkably smooth.

It all starts with the Library module and the importing of images. Catalogs of images can be created quickly for each project, but can just as simply be imported into a unified catalog later. Then tag, sort, rate, and even apply basic edits or presets. With Lightroom 2, you can continue to work with your previews, even when the originals are offline. Large catalogs, at the time of this review, do seem to get sluggish as you add more photos. Adobe has been improving the speed of Lightroom 2 since its original release in 2008, and I would expect to see even more improvements in the future.

A large set of keyboard shortcuts help to further optimize workflow. While not all keys work as consistently across all portions of Lightroom, it is still faster than trying to navigate by mouse alone. Third-party applications can augment these built-in shortcuts, although I do wish Lightroom had the ability to customize the keys, and assign additional shortcuts to other areas of the application (such as commonly used presets). A particular favorite of mine is the “\” key, which toggles between the original and edited image. Another is “shift-tab”, which maximizes the available workspace by collapsing the toolbars. Unfortunately, not all shortcuts work consistently. For example, when using the adjustment brush the “+” and “-” keys will not increment the selected area.

New to Lightroom 2 is multi-monitor support. This functionality is invaluable when working with limited screen space, allowing for larger sized images. Future upgrades could greatly improve upon this concept, allowing for movable tools al la other application offerings from Adobe.

Picture The Results

Lightroom uses non-destructive editing, storing the changes either in the catalog, sidecar, or both, if desired. An important feature in the realm of digital photography when frequently, the client will ask for changes to the final product. That said, it is important to remember to export your images or include the XMP sidecar when distributing to others.

Proper use of presets and templates can dynamically improve workflow. At the time of this review, there are hundreds of free presets available from the Lightroom community in addition to the sets that are available to purchase. By loading a single image of a set, choosing the appropriate preset, and synchronizing the rest of the similar images to the same settings, it becomes apparent the time savings that can be had. Time savings that can lead to better profitability.

Another exciting new feature in Lightroom 2 is the local adjustment brush. Now, you can dodge and burn without leaving Lightroom. The tool isn’t limited to just exposure changes, however. You can also adjust clarity (sharpen the eyes while leaving the skin tones soft), add and remove color (making the sky alone more vibrant), along with other tasks. These too, can be saved as presets. Again, this is another area in which Adobe has been making an effort to improve consistency since Lightroom 2 was released. It’s not quite perfect, but it is better.

Connect The Tools

Most users will take advantage of the first two modules, Library and Develop. But by taking some time to explore the Sildeshow, Print, and Web modules, one can further expand their capabilities, both online and off.

For example, the new flexible print packages from which you can create your own templates, use the built-in set, or download from the web. Design a portfolio of images to print, easily produce contact sheets for the client to choose key shots from, or craft an entire book of pictures, with each page telling a story of the event. You can even create your own identity plate, giving your photos a strong professional image.

One of the great strengths of Lightroom is it’s expandability through plug-ins and connectivity to outside applications such as Photoshop. Panoramas are made simple by sending to and stitching in Photoshop. When the task is finished, the image is returned Lightroom for further editing, if desired. This particular functionality (sending images to Photoshop, regardless of the task) is limited to Photoshop CS3 or above. By converting Photoshop actions to droplets, Lightroom can be further expanded to new realms. Other popular plug-ins include Noise Ninja, Export-to-Flickr or SmugMug, Photomatrix Pro, and LR/Mogrify.

True, Photoshop could also perform many of these tasks. And yes, Camera RAW has the same essential toolset as Lightroom. Certainly Bridge could act as the Library. But if you examine what it would take to quickly and efficiently tag, filter, process, and produce hundreds of images from a single shoot into the best image set possible, one quickly comes to the realization that Lightroom is much better suited for the task.

The Lowdown

If you already have the first version of Lightroom, the upgrade is well worth the expense. If you don’t own Lightroom yet, know that while this application isn’t the only piece of the puzzle (a strong foundation of photography basics is always important), it does provide a great way to optimize your workflow, improve your output, and stun your clientèle with brilliant imagery. Who doesn’t want to spend less time processing, spend more time with camera in hand, capturing the world at large.

The Good

  • Can further optimize workflow and improve output
  • Non-destructive editing
  • Plug-in and outside application extensions
  • Customization tools

The Bad

  • Large libraries can cause slowdowns
  • Inconsistent behavior with some tasks
  • Photoshop connectivity limited to CS3 and above

Price
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 is available here for $299 US (retail) or upgrade from $99 US.

PG

This author has published 13 post(s) so far at FreelanceSwitch. Their bio is coming soon!



  1. PG Chris

    I use lightroom exclusively. I even shoot tethered into it (takes a small trick to do).
    My clients love the proof books I create with the print module. All of the galleries on my website were created with the web module and the “simple” version of Simple Viewer supplied with Lightroom. http://www.crwilliamsphoto.com

    A note on changing workspace size: hotkeys -F5 through F8 individually toggle the top bottom and side bars.

    -Chris

  2. PG Malama

    One alternative to large catalog slowdowns is using iPhoto to browse / organize your photos – it tends to handle large collections more efficiently. Just make sure your set your iPhoto library prefs not to import images (or you’ll duplicate a massive amount of data). You can then keep Lightroom’s bloat down by saving a separate catalog for each job. You can also import those separate catalogs into a single large one to use as your master library.

    This should help with the slowdowns. Hopefully Adobe will improve the efficiency of catalogs in LR3!

  3. PG Markus Griebling

    Hi Dickie,

    I think this is a thorough and well written overview of the Lightroom program and workflow. It is certainly a post that can be linked to to satisfy the curiosity of those who always ask the question, “why should I choose Lightroom?”.

    Cheers, Markus

  4. PG Colin Wright

    I have both Lightroom 2 and the newest version of Aperture, and I’m still torn. I like the interface of Aperture better, but the workflow that I can set up with Lightroom interacts better with the rest of my software.

    I’m still waiting for that one killer app that one of these pieces of software can provide. Anyone have an argument one way or the other?

  5. PG Martha Retallick

    If you’re shooting in RAW and need to edit your photos, sorry, but that Windows Picture and Fax Viewer isn’t going to cut it. This is a job for Photoshop, which can be a real memory hog and slow mover on a laptop, or Lightroom.

    Thanks for the in-depth review, Dickie. I’m planning on adding Lightroom to my laptop so I can keep shooting RAW when I’m not home.

  6. PG Dickie

    Malama: excellent point. I use Picasa for that very task. Bridge would be another option.

    Chris: What are you tethering with, Canon or Nikon?

  7. PG Chris O'Connor

    It took me a long time to get used to Lightroom, but I spend a lot less time editing now, and I can focus on more important things. I hardly ever touch photoshop now.

  8. Dickie,
    I shoot tethered from a Canon EOS-1D MKII. Using the canon utility, create a capture folder, then set up auto import in LR to watch that folder. The files will be pulled right out of the capture folder and right into LR. I imagine the same trick could be done with a Nikon system.
    I’ve done product work like this, and people shooting as well. The people shooting is a bit more fast paced, but LR keeps up.

    -Chris

  9. PG Dickie

    Just got some news back from Adobe concerning an issue with Lightroom where one would get banding if you selected the Canon ACR settings on photos with deep images:

    “,,,a limitation of the tone curve that is embedded in this particular profile (Camera Faithful for the 5D). This was done in the effort to emulate the tone curve of the Canon software when using the Faithful Picture Style, but due to some fundamental differences between how Camera Raw and Canon’s software handle the white and black points in the image, sometimes you can get banding in the deepest shadows with the “Camera” prefix profiles.

    One workaround is to lower the Blacks setting to 0 (the default is 5) and then use the tone curve to add shadow contrast if desired.

    Another workaround is to use the DNG Profile Editor. All that is needed in this case is to open an image from the same camera in the DNG PE, select “Camera Faithful” as the base profile, then do File àExport and save the profile. Then in Camera Raw the user can select this profile instead of Camera Faithful. The banding will be gone. The colors will be almost the same as Camera Faithful, but the tonality will be slightly different in the shadows. The reason why this method works is because using the DNG PE to generate a new profile forces a better sampling of the shadows than the original Camera Faithful profile has.”

    Hope this helps for now.

  10. Hi, if you have any contacts at Adobe, I beg of you to follow up with them and get an answer on why they don’t or can’t fix the issue on multiple versions of the software that started as early as 1.3. It still occurs on 2.x up to the latest version. The exact error is, “An error occurred when attempting to changed modules.”

    I have made multiple blog posts (http://www.dawsonps.com/?s=lightroom) on my site about this error and I have had a handful of readers comment. From what I can tell, the problem is related to the previously installed copy of CS3. I have done everything possible to resolve the issue aside from actually erasing the hard drive on my Mac and reinstalling the OS and everything else. I refuse to do that. If Adobe is too incompetent to fix this bloody error in about seven releases since it first occurred, I won’t use the program. Now, I would love to use the program IF they could fix the problem with a patch or by giving specific instructions but they have not done so. They have said to erase all references to Lightroom from the HD and that too didn’t work.

  11. PG Jessica

    Thank you for sharing!

  12. PG Dickie

    John: I’d be happy to try and help. Reply back to my email and perhaps we can figure it out.

  13. PG Jim Pinto

    Dickie,

    New to this: Can you use Lightroom as a stand alone programe without having to use Photo Shop too? How is Lightroom better than Photo Shop Elliments? What is Appiture? What’s the differance between all of thease programes?

    Thanks,
    Jim Pinto

Leave a Comment